Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 07 Jan 2015 09:43:04 +0100 | From | "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] prctl.2: document SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER vs EFAULT |
| |
On 09/26/2014 12:47 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > This notes the distinction made between EINVAL and EFAULT when attempting > to use SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER with PR_SET_SECCOMP.
Thanks, Kees. Applied.
Cheers,
Michael
> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> > --- > man2/prctl.2 | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/man2/prctl.2 b/man2/prctl.2 > index 1199891..b7ddaac 100644 > --- a/man2/prctl.2 > +++ b/man2/prctl.2 > @@ -825,6 +825,19 @@ is set appropriately. > .I arg2 > is an invalid address. > .TP > +.B EFAULT > +.I option > +is > +.BR PR_SET_SECCOMP , > +.I arg2 > +is > +.BR SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER , > +the system was built with > +.BR CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER > +and > +.I arg3 > +is an invalid address. > +.TP > .B EINVAL > The value of > .I option > @@ -859,6 +872,16 @@ and the kernel was not configured with > .B EINVAL > .I option > is > +.BR PR_SET_SECCOMP , > +.I arg2 > +is > +.BR SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER , > +and the kernel was not configured with > +.BR CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER . > +.TP > +.B EINVAL > +.I option > +is > .BR PR_SET_MM , > and one of the following is true > .RS >
-- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
| |