Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:12:44 +0000 | From | Bryan O'Donoghue <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000 |
| |
On 29/01/15 15:40, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >> It would be nice to have two variants (1) index based & (2) address >> based. > > Understood. The direction from Ingo was to have address based external > interface imr_del_range() and support an index based internal > imr_clear() - internally. > > So - in order to get test coverage - I'll move the self-test code back > into the main IMR code > > Not as pretty that way - but better coverage :)
Talking to myself in public...
Second (third) thought - there's no advantage to moving the test code back in - since imr_add_range() won't return the index anymore...
| |