lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/24] Documentation: DT bindings: add more chip compatible strings for Tegra PCIe
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> wrote:
>
> Add compatible strings for the PCIe IP blocks present on several Tegra
> chips. The primary objective here is to avoid checkpatch warnings,
> per:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-tegra&m=142201349727836&w=2
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>
> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> .../bindings/pci/nvidia,tegra20-pcie.txt | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/nvidia,tegra20-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/nvidia,tegra20-pcie.txt
> index d763e047c6ae..e772884f1c33 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/nvidia,tegra20-pcie.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/nvidia,tegra20-pcie.txt
> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ Required properties:
> - "nvidia,tegra20-pcie"
> - "nvidia,tegra30-pcie"
> - "nvidia,tegra124-pcie"
> + - "nvidia,tegra132-pcie" (not yet matched in the driver)
> + - "nvidia,tegra210-pcie" (not yet matched in the driver)

Whether the driver matches or not is irrelevant to the binding and may
change over time. Does this mean the driver matches on something else
or Tegra132 is not yet supported in the driver? If the former, what is
important is what are the valid combinations of compatible properties
and that is not captured here. In other words, what is the fallback
compatible string for each chip?

The same comments apply to the rest of the series.

Rob


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-01-29 16:01    [W:0.185 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site