Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:32:33 -0700 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: New build failures in Sep 25 tree |
| |
On 09/26/2014 12:59 AM, Stefan Kristiansson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:30:57AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Hi Günther, >> >> [cc openrisc] >> >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: >>> New build failures: >> >>> openrisc-defconfig >>> >>> In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0: >>> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arch': >>> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' undeclared >> >> That's not a new one. It's been failing for half or year or so. >> >> If you only see it now, that means something else got fixed ;-) >> > >>From what I can see, it's caused by > ce5d112827e5 ("ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch for all arches") > that got (re?)introduced two days ago. > > To me it seems that the problem is that EM_OPENRISC is > missing in include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h, but if that's the case, > I think microblaze have the same problem with that patch applied. >
Microblaze builds for some reason. But, yes, that commit is from March. Maybe that is where I remember it from.
You are right, it builds if I add the define. I'll submit a patch to fix the problem if the resulting image builds.
Guenter
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |