Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:03:11 +0200 | From | Nicolas Ferre <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: at91: remove no-MMU at91x40 support |
| |
On 24/09/2014 16:47, Arnd Bergmann : > On Wednesday 24 September 2014 16:18:01 Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> As there is currently no-one to take care of this old !MMU target and as its >> support in recent kernels is a bit rotten, remove this at91x40 support and the >> board file associated with it (at91eb01). >> There are modern ARM !MMU in Mainline now so this target is not interesting for >> building tests anymore. It would be better to start from these modern ARM !MMU >> platforms to reintroduce at91x40 support if needed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig >> index 807b22dadcb6..f3bd8abd25c0 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig >> @@ -18,26 +18,22 @@ config HAVE_AT91_DBGU2 >> config AT91_USE_OLD_CLK >> bool >> >> -config AT91_PMC_UNIT >> - bool >> - default !ARCH_AT91X40 >> - >> config COMMON_CLK_AT91 >> bool >> - default AT91_PMC_UNIT && USE_OF && !AT91_USE_OLD_CLK >> + default USE_OF && !AT91_USE_OLD_CLK >> select COMMON_CLK >> >> config OLD_CLK_AT91 >> bool >> - default AT91_PMC_UNIT && AT91_USE_OLD_CLK >> + default AT91_USE_OLD_CLK >> >> config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET >> bool >> - default !ARCH_AT91X40 >> + default y >> >> config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET >> bool >> - default !ARCH_AT91X40 >> + default y >> >> config AT91_SAM9_TIME >> bool > > I think these can be simplified further: AT91_SAM9G45_RESET and > AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET can just go away and the files put into > obj-y.
Yes, I had the same idea before realizing that these two directives will move away in a patch already sent for 3.18. So, as this material is probably 3.19-ish, I kept them as they are and keep in mind to remove them when I merge them with 3.18-rc1...
> OLD_CLK_AT91 is the same as AT91_USE_OLD_CLK, so you could > just use that instead. I suspect the 'USE_OF' dependency for > COMMON_CLK_AT91 can also go away, since all platforms are > either board file based and select AT91_USE_OLD_CLK, or they > are DT based and don't.
Here also, I didn't want to touch more because we need to remove the arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt file very soon (3.19) and I don't want to change this file (or all the SoC files) before the chunks related to these directives simply go away.
Tell me if it makes sense.
Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre
| |