Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:57:34 +0100 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 |
| |
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 02:44:10AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:00:16PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > +No code shall be accepted into the kernel unless it complies with the released > > +standards from UEFI ASWG. If there are features missing from ACPI to make it > > +function on a platform, ECRs should be submitted to ASWG and go through the > > +approval process. > > Similar question here. Is the expectation that all ARM vendors will > become UEFI contributors?
I should also add that this is inconsistent with how we've managed things in the x86 world - there's a great deal of ACPI functionality implemented that's not covered in the spec.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |