Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: deferred set priority (dprio) | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Sun, 10 Aug 2014 05:41:59 +0200 |
| |
On Sun, 2014-08-10 at 05:13 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 20:04 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > NAK. There it is, my imaginary NAK to imaginary realtime priorities :) > > > > Ok, but do you have any alternative proposal yourself how to solve the > > lockholder preemption problem? I assume you agree it's a real problem. > > > > Just being negative is not very constructive. > > I both acknowledged the problem problem, and made alternative > suggestions.
Note who I replied to
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/28/77
| |