lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv9 3/3] arm: dts: Add Altera SDRAM controller bindings
On 07/30/2014 01:22 PM, tthayer@opensource.altera.com wrote:
> From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@opensource.altera.com>
>
> Add the Altera SDRAM controller bindings and device tree changes to the Altera SoC project.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <tthayer@opensource.altera.com>
> ---
> v2: Changes to SoC SDRAM EDAC code.
>
> v3: Implement code suggestions for SDRAM EDAC code.
>
> v4: Remove syscon from SDRAM controller bindings.
>
> v5: No Change, bump version for consistency.
>
> v6: Only map the ctrlcfg register as syscon.
>
> v7: No change. Bump for consistency.
>
> v8: No change. Bump for consistency.
>
> v9: Changes to support a MFD SDRAM controller with nested EDAC.
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt | 13 +++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2bb1ddf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +Altera SOCFPGA SDRAM Controller
> +The SDRAM controller is implemented as a MFD so various drivers may
> +nest under this main SDRAM controller binding.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : "altr,sdr";
> +- reg : Should contain 1 register range(address and length)
> +
> +Example:
> + sdr@0xffc25000 {
> + compatible = "altr,sdr";
> + reg = <0xffc25000 0x1000>;
> + };
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> index 4676f25..ecb306d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> @@ -603,6 +603,16 @@
> };
> };
>
> + sdr@0xffc25000 {
> + compatible = "altr,sdr";
> + reg = <0xffc25000 0x1000>;
> +
> + sdramedac@0 {
> + compatible = "altr,sdram-edac";
> + interrupts = <0 39 4>;
> + };

This doesn't match the documentation, but I don't think this is a move
in the right direction anyway. Because Linux has/wants an MFD driver is
not a reason to add a sub node. It is a single h/w block and DT should
reflect that.

Rob



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-08-18 14:41    [W:0.171 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site