Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Jul 2014 10:58:55 -0700 | From | Josh Triplett <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: Update RCU maintainership |
| |
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:42:04PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Drop Dipankar Sarma at his request (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/2/628), > add Josh Triplett based on long-term review, contributions, and > agreement to take on this role (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/2/554). > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Does it make sense to keep separate entries for each of these, at this point, or should we just merge all of them into the main "READ-COPY UPDATE (RCU)" entry?
> MAINTAINERS | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 92f2bf91eec1..922661d17083 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -7405,6 +7405,7 @@ F: kernel/rcu/torture.c > > RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK > M: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > +M: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> > R: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > R: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> > R: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> > @@ -7430,8 +7431,8 @@ S: Supported > F: net/rds/ > > READ-COPY UPDATE (RCU) > -M: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> > M: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > +M: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> > R: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > R: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> > R: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> > @@ -8214,6 +8215,7 @@ F: mm/sl?b.c > SLEEPABLE READ-COPY UPDATE (SRCU) > M: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> > M: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > +M: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> > R: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > R: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> > L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -- > 1.8.1.5 >
| |