lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/7] kernel: Add support for restart notifier call chain
On Sun,  6 Jul 2014 16:38:14 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:

> Various drivers implement architecture and/or device specific means
> to restart (reset) the system. Various mechanisms have been implemented
> to support those schemes. The best known mechanism is arm_pm_restart,
> which is a function pointer to be set either from platform specific code
> or from drivers. Another mechanism is to use hardware watchdogs to issue
> a reset; this mechanism is used if there is no other method available
> to reset a board or system. Two examples are alim7101_wdt, which currently
> uses the reboot notifier to trigger a reset, and moxart_wdt, which registers
> the arm_pm_restart function.
>
> The existing mechanisms have a number of drawbacks. Typically only one scheme
> to restart the system is supported (at least if arm_pm_restart is used).
> At least in theory there can be mutliple means to restart the system, some of
> which may be less desirable (for example one mechanism may only reset the CPU,
> while another may reset the entire system). Using arm_pm_restart can also be
> racy if the function pointer is set from a driver, as the driver may be in
> the process of being unloaded when arm_pm_restart is called.
> Using the reboot notifier is always racy, as it is unknown if and when
> other functions using the reboot notifier have completed execution
> by the time the watchdog fires.
>
> To solve the problem, introduce a system restart notifier. This notifier
> is expected to be called from the architecture specific machine_restart()
> function. Drivers providing system restart functionality (such as the watchdog
> drivers mentioned above) are expected to register with this notifier.

It all looks sane to my unfamiliar eye.

> /*
> + * Notifier list for kernel code which wants to be called
> + * to restart the system.
> + */

hm, is this all we have to say?

> --- a/kernel/reboot.c
> +++ b/kernel/reboot.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,38 @@ int unregister_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_reboot_notifier);
>
> +/**
> + * register_restart_notifier - Register function to be called to reset
> + * the system
> + * @nb: Info about notifier function to be called
> + *
> + * Registers a function with the list of functions
> + * to be called to restart the system.
> + *
> + * Currently always returns zero, as blocking_notifier_chain_register()
> + * always returns zero.
> + */

This would be a good place to describe what those notifier callbacks
actually do. Why they exist, what their role is, under what
circumstances they are called, what values they should return, etc.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-08 00:01    [W:0.079 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site