Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Jul 2014 19:39:29 +0530 | From | Kishon Vijay Abraham I <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] phy: core: the node pointer of PHY need not be the same as that of PHY provider |
| |
Hi,
On Monday 07 July 2014 06:42 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 04 Jul 2014, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > >> In case of multi-phy PHY providers, each PHY should be modeled as a sub >> node of the PHY provider. Then each PHY will have a different node pointer >> (node pointer of sub node) than that of PHY provider. Added this provision >> in the PHY core. >> Also fixed all drivers to use the updated API. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> >> --- >> Documentation/phy.txt | 10 ++++++---- >> drivers/phy/phy-bcm-kona-usb2.c | 2 +- >> drivers/phy/phy-core.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- >> drivers/phy/phy-exynos-dp-video.c | 2 +- >> drivers/phy/phy-exynos-mipi-video.c | 2 +- >> drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 3 ++- >> drivers/phy/phy-exynos5250-sata.c | 2 +- >> drivers/phy/phy-mvebu-sata.c | 2 +- >> drivers/phy/phy-omap-usb2.c | 2 +- >> drivers/phy/phy-samsung-usb2.c | 3 ++- >> drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c | 2 +- >> drivers/phy/phy-ti-pipe3.c | 2 +- >> drivers/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c | 2 +- >> drivers/phy/phy-xgene.c | 2 +- >> include/linux/phy/phy.h | 15 ++++++++++----- >> 15 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > I wrote a very similar patch already. I knew I should have sent it on > Friday. :(
No problem! you can send your patch along with the MiPHY series.
Cheers Kishon > > Patch looks good, just a real minor point. > >> phy->dev.class = phy_class; >> phy->dev.parent = dev; >> - phy->dev.of_node = dev->of_node; >> + phy->dev.of_node = node?node:dev->of_node; > > There should be spaces either side of the '?' and ':', or you can do > this more succinctly by: > > phy->dev.of_node = node ?: dev->of_node; > > Once fixed, feel free to add my: > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> >
| |