Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:37:19 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: Selling Points for MARS Light |
| |
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 03:04:07PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Thomas Schöbel-Theuer > <thomas@schoebel-theuer.de> wrote: > > Hi together, > > > > since not all people have attended my presentations on MARS Light, and > > since probably not all are willing to click at links such as to the > > presentation slides > > https://github.com/schoebel/mars/blob/master/docu/MARS_LinuxTag2014.pdf?raw=true > > , I will try to explain something which goes beyond the presentations, > > but nevertheless I don't want to repeat too much from the slides. > > > > So the following is hopefully also interesting for people who attended > > the presentations. > > > > My main selling point: > > > > To my knowledge, MARS Light is the only enterprise-grade opensource > > solution constructed for mass replication of whole datacenters > > (thousands to tenthousands of instances) over _long_ _distances_, aka > > _geo-redundancy_. > > I think hch meant not a high level marketing-drone -ready design document > by "explain and sell your design". > We are interested in the real low level design ideas. > i.e. Why do you need all syscalls exported?
Exactly, normally we don't care about any high-level things, I want to know why you think you have to call remove within a kernel module when no one else does that.
Also, I doubt you handle the namespace issue properly, but given that it is impossible to review the 50+ patches as sent, it might be correct, or might not, I don't know...
greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |