Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:28:43 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq: Rework IRQF_NO_SUSPENDED |
| |
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:20:08PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> I'm curious what you mean. Are you referring to the fact that its input > is simply an IRQ number (regardless of whether the IRQ is shared), not > something that identifies the particular handler (e.g., struct > irqaction)?
Yes. I know that shared stuff is a massive head-ache, but I feel we should not introduce primitives that do not work with it.
| |