| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 3.10 06/56] tracing: Fix graph tracer with stack tracer on other archs | Date | Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:01:59 -0700 |
| |
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
commit 5f8bf2d263a20b986225ae1ed7d6759dc4b93af9 upstream.
Running my ftrace tests on PowerPC, it failed the test that checks if function_graph tracer is affected by the stack tracer. It was. Looking into this, I found that the update_function_graph_func() must be called even if the trampoline function is not changed. This is because archs like PowerPC do not support ftrace_ops being passed by assembly and instead uses a helper function (what the trampoline function points to). Since this function is not changed even when multiple ftrace_ops are added to the code, the test that falls out before calling update_function_graph_func() will miss that the update must still be done.
Call update_function_graph_function() for all calls to update_ftrace_function()
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
--- kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c @@ -331,12 +331,12 @@ static void update_ftrace_function(void) func = ftrace_ops_list_func; } + update_function_graph_func(); + /* If there's no change, then do nothing more here */ if (ftrace_trace_function == func) return; - update_function_graph_func(); - /* * If we are using the list function, it doesn't care * about the function_trace_ops.
|