lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: "." in vmlinux.lds.S
From
Yeah, the symbol "__end_rodata_hpage_align" is defined as absolute in
older binutils, the newer binutils making it relative seems
meaningless in this context.

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> On 06/06/2014 10:08 AM, Hán Shěn (沈涵) wrote:
>> A gentle ping?
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Hán Shěn (沈涵) <shenhan@google.com> wrote:
>>> Hi we are trying to boot up a x86_64 chrome book using binutils 2.24 and
>>> kernel 3.8, but failed.
>>>
>>> After some triage work, we found that a 2-year-old binutil CL changed the
>>> interpretation of "." in linker script (short story: absolute -> relative,
>>> long story: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-06/msg00155.html).
>>>
>>> After some further work, we are able to boot the kernel with a kernel patch
>>> pasted at EOM. I am curious, why the upstream kernel is never hit by this
>>> behavior? We enabled "CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA", so we were hit, is this some
>>> macro not usually turned on?
>
> What does a section-relative symbol do?
>
> --Andy



--
Han Shen | Software Engineer | shenhan@google.com | +1-650-440-3330
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-06 21:21    [W:0.040 / U:1.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site