Messages in this thread | | | From | "Allan, Bruce W" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH] checkpatch: warn when patch exceeds a maximum message size | Date | Fri, 6 Jun 2014 15:35:58 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@perches.com] > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 8:34 AM > To: Allan, Bruce W > Cc: apw@canonical.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; postmaster > Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: warn when patch exceeds a maximum > message size > > On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 08:26 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:08 +0000, Allan, Bruce W wrote: > > > From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@perches.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 6:36 PM > > > > On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 17:00 -0700, Bruce Allan wrote: > > > > > the maximum message size (100,000 characters) allowed by > Majordomo at > > > > > vger.kernel.org since that is where most Linux email lists are served. > > > > I believe this is incorrect and the patch is unnecessary. > > > Actually, it is correct (it even says so at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html). > > where? > > Duh, near the very end it does have: > > Message size exceeding 100 000 characters causes blocking. > > But I believe that info is out of date. >
If it is out of date, can you explain how/why we got stung by it?
| |