Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:31:09 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/22] pci-dma-compat: Add pci_zalloc_consistent helper | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:51:51 -0700
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:27 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 06:41:29 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: >> >> > Add this helper for consistency with pci_zalloc_coherent >> > and the ability to remove unnecessary memset(,0,) uses. >> >> While we're being anal.. I'm not a big fan of the patch titles. Worst >> is "amd: Use pci_zalloc_consistent". "amd" is quite a poor identifier >> - it's only when you get in and look at the diff that you realise it's >> an ethernet driver. > > Yeah, those "amd:" prefixes should really have been "pcnet32:" > >> People sometimes address this by using >> >> "drivers: net: ethernet: amd: use pci_zalloc_consistent" >> >> which strikes me as utterly perverse. We already have a nice way of >> representing the hierarchy and that's using '/'. > > I used to do that until several people complained. > Now I don't. btw: Documentation/SubmittingPatches says: > > 15) The canonical patch format > > The canonical patch subject line is: > > Subject: [PATCH 001/123] subsystem: summary phrase
+1
We've been representing subsystems using colon prefixes for ages, and I can't seen the value of starting to use something inconsistent with a decade of precedence.
| |