Messages in this thread | | | From | Andy Lutomirski <> | Date | Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:59:06 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] seccomp: add PR_SECCOMP_EXT and SECCOMP_EXT_ACT_TSYNC |
| |
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Would you be willing to carry this series? Andy Lutomirski appears > happy with it now. (Thanks again for all the feedback Andy!) If so, it > has a relatively small merge conflict with the bpf changes living in > net-next. Would you prefer I rebase against net-next, let sfr handle > it, get carried in net-next, or some other option?
Well, I'm still not entirely convinced that we want to have this much multiplexing in a prctl, and I'm still a bit unconvinced that the code wouldn't be better off it it were completely atomic in the sense that it would either work or fail without doing anything.
--Andy
| |