lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] i2c: designware: No need to disable already disabled controller
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 08:34:08PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:12:34PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 05:37:21PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > If the controller is already in desired state (enabled/disabled) there is
> > > no point in setting its state again.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Does it have a side-effect when setting then enable bit again? Otherwise
> > it will exit the loop immediately on the first try. Not too bad IMO
> > given the additional code saved.
>
> AFAICT there shouldn't be any side effect. So the $subject patch just
> saves one register write in the best case. You are right, maybe it's not
> worth adding 3 extra lines of code just for that :)

:) Okay, so I'll drop it.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-02 20:21    [W:0.046 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site