lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> a) is this the right approach in general? The previous discussion
> pointed this way, but there may be other opinions.

The syscall changes seem like the sort of thing I'd expect, although
patches adding new syscalls or otherwise affecting the kernel/userspace
interface (as opposed to those relating to an individual filesystem)
should go to linux-api as well as other relevant lists.

--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-02 17:21    [W:0.543 / U:0.368 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site