| Date | Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:52:19 +0000 | From | "Joseph S. Myers" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready |
| |
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> a) is this the right approach in general? The previous discussion > pointed this way, but there may be other opinions.
The syscall changes seem like the sort of thing I'd expect, although patches adding new syscalls or otherwise affecting the kernel/userspace interface (as opposed to those relating to an individual filesystem) should go to linux-api as well as other relevant lists.
-- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com
|