lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] watchdog: Add Cadence WDT driver
On 06/02/2014 03:17 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:25:16AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 05/29/2014 03:19 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:43:05AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>
>>>>>> +static struct of_device_id cdns_wdt_of_match[] = {
>>>>>> + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynq-wdt-r1p2", },
>>>>>> + { .compatible = "cdns,wdt-r1p2", },
>>>>>
>>>>> If these can currently be handled identically, why not just have
>>>>> "cdns,wdt-r1p2" in the driver and in your dts have:
>>>>>
>>>>> compatible = "xlnx,zynq-wdt-r1p2", "cdns,wdt-r1p2";
>>>>>
>>>>> If we need to distinguish the two for some reason later we can always
>>>>> add the "xlnx,zynq-wdt-r1p2" string to the driver.
>>>>
>>>> I would prefer to have 2 compatible strings just because
>>>> of that we don't know what is different compare to origin cadence
>>>> version. We have done the same for spi-cadence.c that's why
>>>> it shouldn't be any problem to keep it as is.
>>>> Having zynq compatible property here and using it give us option
>>>> that if another SoC vendor come with new configuration or clean
>>>> cadence one we can simple handle it without changing compatible
>>>> property for us.
>>>
>>> Sure, we can have two documented strings. But as I mention for the
>>> moment the driver only needs to support the one string so long as a
>>> given dts has both. Then we can later distinguish the zynq variant (or
>>> any other) as necessary.
>>
>> ok then. Let's use just "xlnx,zynq-wdt-r1p2" compatible string here
>> and remove "cdns,wdt-r1p2"
>
> That if anything seems backwards -- the driver should jsut take the most
> general string for now: "cdns,wdt-r1p2", while the dtb will have both:
>
> compatible = "xlnx,zynq-wdt-r1p2", "cdns,wdt-r1p2";
>
> The driver can later disintguish "xlnx,zynq-wdt-r1p2" specially if
> necessary.

ah. Ok I see your point now. No problem to do it in this way.

Thanks,
Michal





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-02 16:21    [W:0.043 / U:2.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site