lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 11/21] mfd: use devm_irq_of_parse_and_map() where appropriate
>> Hmm...  probably it was too early to apply this?  I was just going
>> to prepare v2, based on discussion...
>
> Which discussion?

One you are replying in?

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/136

>> Also, applying only 11/21, without 01/21, will just cause build errors ...
>
> CC'ing me on this patch alone when you know you have build
> dependencies on other patches in the set is a bad idea. Failing to
> mention that you wanted the patch to be handled in a special and/or
> unconventional way is an even worse idea.
>
> How are you expecting this patch(-set) to be handled?

Sorry but I did not CC you this patch.

I sent entire patchset to mailing lists and to maintainers of IRQ and
device tree subsystems.
I used git send-email, and all mails went out to the same recipients.
Recipient addresses extracted using scripts/get_maintainer.pl applied to
the "main" patch of the patchset.
I did not sent entire patchset to maintainers of individual changed
drivers because this makes recipient address too big and too much looks
like spamming.
I did not send individual patches to individual addresses to avoid cases
of partially-applied patchset that will just break things (actually this
is what happened with 11/21)

I'm quite sorry if I did things wrong, it was my first attempt to sent
patchset with tree-wide fixes. However, I don't see what I've done
wrong... any hints on that will be appreciated.

Nikita



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-06-18 14:01    [W:0.699 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site