lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: dcache shrink list corruption?
From
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> OK... There's one more thing I would like to put there, if you are going to
> be away for the week. It has sat in -next for a while, and it could stay
> there, except that there's a _lot_ of followups touching stuff all over the
> tree and I'd obviously prefer those to go into subsystem trees. Which
> means inter-tree dependencies ;-/ Would you be OK if I included that one
> into pull request? It just turns kvfree() into inline and takes it to
> mm.h, next to is_vmalloc_addr();

Is there any particular reason for inlining this? I'd actually rather
not, _especially_ if it means that a lot of "is_vmalloc_addr()" usage
goes away and we may end up with this as a real interface.

But no, I don't hate the patch.

Linus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-06 19:41    [W:0.151 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site