| Date | Fri, 30 May 2014 11:41:23 -0400 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC - TAKE TWO - 06/12] block, bfq: improve responsiveness |
| |
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:05:37AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote: > @@ -281,7 +323,8 @@ static inline unsigned long bfq_serv_to_charge(struct request *rq, > struct bfq_queue *bfqq) > { > return blk_rq_sectors(rq) * > - (1 + ((!bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq)) * bfq_async_charge_factor)); > + (1 + ((!bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq)) * (bfqq->wr_coeff == 1) * > + bfq_async_charge_factor));
Ah, okay, so you actually use it later. Please disregard my previous comment about dropping the wrapper.
Thanks.
-- tejun
|