Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 26 May 2014 08:52:23 -0500 | Subject | Re: remap_file_pages() use | From | Jeff Smith <> |
| |
I've got no real issues at this point, but could you perhaps elaborate a bit on the rough order of magnitude of "long" time and what cases would be slower? I'm pretty sure that some places I've worked that still have some remap_file_pages() logic in place aren't too religious about checking dmesg. --Jeff
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Jeff Smith wrote: >> OK, I misinterpreted "the overlapped part of the mapping(s) will be >> discarded" as discarding the -new- mappings. My objections about >> needing a replacement for remap_file_pages() are gone, but my concerns >> about existing code still remain. > > As I said, emulation will be there for long time. With warning in dmesg. > The emulation is interface-compatible, but slower in some cases (not > your's). > > -- > Kirill A. Shutemov
| |