lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v12 30/31] ARM: dts: add System MMU nodes of exynos5250
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:13:19 -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Vikas,
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Vikas Sajjan <sajjan.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi shaik,
> >
> > +Doug, Abhilash,
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Shaik Ameer Basha
> > <shaik.ameer@samsung.com> wrote:
> >> From: Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 270 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 267 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> >> index 3742331..eebd397 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> >> @@ -82,6 +82,16 @@
> >> reg = <0x10044040 0x20>;
> >> };
> >>
> >> + pd_isp: isp-power-domain@0x10044020 {
> >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd";
> >> + reg = <0x10044020 0x20>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + pd_disp1: disp1-power-domain@0x100440A0 {
> >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd";
> >> + reg = <0x100440A0 0x20>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >
> > As per subject "add System MMU nodes of exynos5250", it should only
> > add SysMMU node.
> > So, I think adding power domain nodes should go in a separate patch.
> >
> > Adding power domain nodes can break the system, if powering ON/OFF of
> > the given power domain is NOT taken care well.
> > I can see ISP is one such case. With this series I can see S2R breaks
> > [1] on 5250 chromebook with current mainline kernel (same applies for
> > arndale and smdk5250, but I have tested on these boards yet)
>
> Thanks for catching that! Let's make sure not to break suspend/resume.
>
> Given that these power domains are actually used as the domains for
> some of the System MMU nodes I don't totally object to adding them in
> the same patch, but if they're breaking things then I agree that we
> could leave them out and add them in a later patch (once issues are
> sorted out).
>

Thank you, Vikas.

Let me consider adding ISP power doamin after checking
power down sequence of ISP domain.

KyongHo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-05-01 16:41    [W:0.337 / U:0.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site