Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:08:16 -0400 | From | Waiman Long <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation |
| |
On 04/04/2014 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying >> to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the >> equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion: >> >> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@infradead.org >> >> You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches. >> >> I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get this >> moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you atm. > Uh? Did you CC also xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org on your patches Peter? > I hadn't had a chance to see or comment on them :-( >
Peter's patch is a rewrite of my patches 1-4, there is no PV or unfair lock support in there.
-Longman
| |