lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] printk: Print cpu number along with time
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK_CPU
> > + if (!buf)
> > + return snprintf(NULL, 0, "[%5lu.000000,%02x] ",
>
> %02x for a cpu? What happens on machines with 8k cpus?

Ummm ... what issue do you see here, Greg? It'll print 0x1f40, no?

> And is this really an issue? Debugging by using printk is fun, but not
> really something that people need to add a cpu number to. Why not just
> use a tracepoint in your code to get the needed information instead?

Well, if you have dmesg dump from panic that happens every other year, and
you have to do post-mortem analysis on it, I am pretty sure you would love
to be able to figure out how the stack traces would look like without
inter-CPU interleaving. And I am pretty sure you wouldn't want to
insert/enable a tracepoint and wait another two years for the bug to
trigger again.

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-26 18:21    [W:0.119 / U:0.868 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site