lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Torvald Riegel wrote:

> I think that if we have different options, there needs to be agreement
> on which to choose across the compilers, at the very least. I don't
> quite know how this looks like for GCC and LLVM, for example.

I'm not sure we even necessarily get compatibility for the alignment of
_Atomic types yet (and no ABI document I've seen discusses that issue).

--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-07 01:01    [W:0.200 / U:0.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site