Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:04:54 +0000 | From | Charles Keepax <> | Subject | Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 02/15] ASoC: dapm: Add locked version of snd_soc_dapm_xxxx_pin functions |
| |
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:30:30AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 06:06:03PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > > > Hm, this is a bit confusing. For other functions in ASoC when we > > have a pair of functions with the _locked suffix and without the one > > with _locked takes the lock, the other one doesn't. E.g. > > snd_soc_update_bits_locked. Here we do it the other way around. > > Yes, this is definitely confusing. The existing naming might not be the > best but making things inconsistent isn't going to help the situation > either.
Oops... sorry that was not intentional I will respin to correct this.
Thanks, Charles
> _______________________________________________ > Alsa-devel mailing list > Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
| |