lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 4/7] fs/proc/task_mmu.c: shift mm_access() from m_start() to proc_maps_open()
    "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> writes:

    > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 09:46:55PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
    >> A simple test-case from Kirill Shutemov
    >>
    >> cat /proc/self/maps >/dev/null
    >> chmod +x /proc/self/net/packet
    >> exec /proc/self/net/packet
    >>
    >> makes lockdep unhappy, cat/exec take seq_file->lock + cred_guard_mutex in
    >> the opposite order.
    >
    > Oleg, I see it again with almost the same test-case:
    >
    > cat /proc/self/stack >/dev/null
    > chmod +x /proc/self/net/packet
    > exec /proc/self/net/packet
    >
    > Looks like bunch of proc files were converted to use seq_file by Alexey
    > Dobriyan around the same time you've fixed the issue for /proc/pid/maps.
    >
    > More generic test-case:
    >
    > find /proc/self/ -type f -exec dd if='{}' of=/dev/null bs=1 count=1 ';' 2>/dev/null
    > chmod +x /proc/self/net/packet
    > exec /proc/self/net/packet
    >
    > David, any justification for allowing chmod +x for files under
    > /proc/pid/net?

    I don't think there are any good reasons for allowing chmod +x for the
    proc generic files. Certainly executing any of them is nonsense.

    I do recall some weird conner cases existing. I think they resulted
    in a need to preserve chmod if not chmod +x. This is just me saying
    tread carefully before you change anything.

    It really should be safe to tweak proc_notify_change to not allow
    messing with the executable bits of proc files.

    > [ 2.042212] ======================================================
    > [ 2.042930] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
    > [ 2.043648] 3.18.0-rc7-00003-g3a18ca061311-dirty #237 Not tainted
    > [ 2.044350] -------------------------------------------------------
    > [ 2.045054] sh/94 is trying to acquire lock:
    > [ 2.045546] (&p->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811e12fd>] seq_read+0x3d/0x3e0
    > [ 2.045781]
    > [ 2.045781] but task is already holding lock:
    > [ 2.045781] (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c0e3d>] prepare_bprm_creds+0x2d/0x90
    > [ 2.045781]
    > [ 2.045781] which lock already depends on the new lock.
    > [ 2.045781]
    > [ 2.045781]
    > [ 2.045781] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
    > [ 2.045781]
    > -> #1 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}:
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff810a6e99>] __lock_acquire+0x4d9/0xd40
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff810a7ff2>] lock_acquire+0xd2/0x2a0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff81849da6>] mutex_lock_killable_nested+0x66/0x460
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff81229de4>] lock_trace+0x24/0x70
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff81229e8f>] proc_pid_stack+0x5f/0xe0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff81227244>] proc_single_show+0x54/0xa0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811e13a0>] seq_read+0xe0/0x3e0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811b9377>] vfs_read+0x97/0x180
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811b9f5d>] SyS_read+0x4d/0xc0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff8184e492>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
    > [ 2.045781]
    > -> #0 (&p->lock){+.+.+.}:
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff810a389f>] validate_chain.isra.36+0xfff/0x1400
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff810a6e99>] __lock_acquire+0x4d9/0xd40
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff810a7ff2>] lock_acquire+0xd2/0x2a0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff81849629>] mutex_lock_nested+0x69/0x3c0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811e12fd>] seq_read+0x3d/0x3e0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff81226428>] proc_reg_read+0x48/0x70
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811b9377>] vfs_read+0x97/0x180
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811bf1a8>] kernel_read+0x48/0x60
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811bfb2c>] prepare_binprm+0xdc/0x180
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811c139a>] do_execve_common.isra.29+0x4fa/0x960
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811c1818>] do_execve+0x18/0x20
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811c1b05>] SyS_execve+0x25/0x30
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff8184ea49>] stub_execve+0x69/0xa0
    > [ 2.045781]
    > [ 2.045781] other info that might help us debug this:
    > [ 2.045781]
    > [ 2.045781] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
    > [ 2.045781]
    > [ 2.045781] CPU0 CPU1
    > [ 2.045781] ---- ----
    > [ 2.045781] lock(&sig->cred_guard_mutex);
    > [ 2.045781] lock(&p->lock);
    > [ 2.045781] lock(&sig->cred_guard_mutex);
    > [ 2.045781] lock(&p->lock);
    > [ 2.045781]
    > [ 2.045781] *** DEADLOCK ***
    > [ 2.045781]
    > [ 2.045781] 1 lock held by sh/94:
    > [ 2.045781] #0: (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c0e3d>] prepare_bprm_creds+0x2d/0x90
    > [ 2.045781]
    > [ 2.045781] stack backtrace:
    > [ 2.045781] CPU: 0 PID: 94 Comm: sh Not tainted 3.18.0-rc7-00003-g3a18ca061311-dirty #237
    > [ 2.045781] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
    > [ 2.045781] ffffffff82a48d50 ffff88085427bad8 ffffffff81844a85 0000000000000cac
    > [ 2.045781] ffffffff82a654a0 ffff88085427bb28 ffffffff810a1b03 0000000000000000
    > [ 2.045781] ffff88085427bb68 ffff88085427bb28 ffff8808547f1500 ffff8808547f1c40
    > [ 2.045781] Call Trace:
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff81844a85>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff810a1b03>] print_circular_bug+0x203/0x310
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff810a389f>] validate_chain.isra.36+0xfff/0x1400
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff8108fa76>] ? local_clock+0x16/0x30
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff810a6e99>] __lock_acquire+0x4d9/0xd40
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff810a7ff2>] lock_acquire+0xd2/0x2a0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811e12fd>] ? seq_read+0x3d/0x3e0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff81849629>] mutex_lock_nested+0x69/0x3c0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811e12fd>] ? seq_read+0x3d/0x3e0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff8108f9f8>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x98/0xc0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811e12fd>] ? seq_read+0x3d/0x3e0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff814050b9>] ? lockref_put_or_lock+0x29/0x40
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811e12fd>] seq_read+0x3d/0x3e0
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff814050b9>] ? lockref_put_or_lock+0x29/0x40
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff81226428>] proc_reg_read+0x48/0x70
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811b9377>] vfs_read+0x97/0x180
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811bf1a8>] kernel_read+0x48/0x60
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811bfb2c>] prepare_binprm+0xdc/0x180
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811c139a>] do_execve_common.isra.29+0x4fa/0x960
    > [ 2.092142] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 2693.484 MHz
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811c0fd3>] ? do_execve_common.isra.29+0x133/0x960
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff8184f04d>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811c1818>] do_execve+0x18/0x20
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff811c1b05>] SyS_execve+0x25/0x30
    > [ 2.045781] [<ffffffff8184ea49>] stub_execve+0x69/0xa0


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2014-12-03 18:41    [W:3.638 / U:0.068 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site