lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: thunderbolt: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function call "ring_free"
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c?id=fc14f9c1272f62c3e8d01300f52467c0d9af50f9#n268
>
> I think static functions can be named whatever
> the developer chooses.

I agree also that this implementation detail is correct in principle.

Is a renaming of such identifiers feasible so that the probability of
other name clashes can be reduced and corresponding static source
code analysis might become a bit easier?

How do you prefer to handle name space issues?

Regards,
Markus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-23 17:21    [W:1.941 / U:0.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site