lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: kdbus: add node and filesystem implementation
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> From: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>
>>
>> kdbusfs is a filesystem that will expose a fresh kdbus domain context
>> each time it is mounted. Per mount point, there will be a 'control'
>> node, which can be used to create buses. fs.c contains the
>> implementation of that pseudo-fs. Exported inodes of 'file' type have
>> their i_fop set to either kdbus_handle_control_ops or
>> kdbus_handle_ep_ops, depending on their type. The actual dispatching
>> of file operations is done from handle.c
>>
>> node.c is an implementation of a kdbus object that has an id and
>> children, organized in an R/B tree. The tree is used by the filesystem
>> code for lookup and iterator functions, and to deactivate children
>> once the parent is deactivated. Every inode exported by kdbusfs is
>> backed by a kdbus_node, hence it is embedded in struct kdbus_ep,
>> struct kdbus_bus and struct kdbus_domain.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>
>> Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@opendz.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>> ---
>
>
>> +
>> +static struct file_system_type fs_type = {
>> + .name = KBUILD_MODNAME "fs",
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .mount = fs_super_mount,
>> + .kill_sb = fs_super_kill,
>> +};
>
> Does this want something like:
>
> .fs_flags = FS_USERNS_MOUNT
>
> This design may have the annoying property that, if a namespace-based
> sandbox wants to use kdbus itself, it will need to proxy anything from
> the parent that it wants to use.
>
> Is there a good reason why individual *busses* don't show up in the
> filesystem? If they did, maybe they could be bind-mounted or
> otherwise arranged to cross namespace boundaries.
>

Whoops. Brainfart there -- busses do show up in the filesystem. Does
bind-mounting them work?

--Andy


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-21 18:21    [W:0.086 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site