Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:42:40 +1100 | From | Dave Chinner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] vfs: Non-blockling buffered fs read (page cache only) |
| |
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:03:14PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Milosz Tanski <milosz@adfin.com> writes: > > >> Can you write a test (or set of) for fstests that exercises this new > >> functionality? I'm not worried about performance, just > >> correctness.... > > > > Sure thing. Can you point me at the fstests repo? A quick google > > search reveals lots of projects named fstests, most of them abandoned. > > I think he's referring to xfstests. Still, I think that's the wrong > place for functional testing. ltp would be better, imo.
I don't follow. Can you explain why is xfstests be the wrong place to exercise this functionality and what makes ltp a better choice?
Cheers,
Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com
| |