lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [RFC] mnt: add ability to clone mntns starting with the current root
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>>> Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am squinting and looking this way and that but while I can imagine
>>>>> someone more clever than I can think up some unique property of rootfs
>>>>> that makes it a little more exploitable than just mounting a ramfs,
>>>>> but since you have to be root to exploit those properties I think the
>>>>> game is pretty much lost.
>>>>
>>>> Yes. rootfs might not be empty, it might have totally insane
>>>> permissions, and it's globally shared, which makes it into a wonderful
>>>> channel to pass things around that shouldn't be passed around.
>>>
>>> But if only root with proc mounted can reach it... I don't know.
>>
>> It doesn't have to be global root. It could be userns root.
>>
>>> There might be a case for setting MNT_LOCKED when we overmount "/"
>>> as root but I don't yet see it.
>>>
>>>> Can non-root do this? You'd need to be in a userns with a "/" that
>>>> isn't MNT_LOCKED. Can this happen on any normal setup?
>>>>
>>>> FWIW, I think we should unconditionally MNT_LOCKED the root on userns
>>>> unshare, even if it's the only mount.
>>>
>>> To the best of my knowledge MNT_LOCKED is set uncondintially on userns
>>> unshare.
>>
>> Only if list_empty(&old->mnt_expire), whatever that means, I think.
>
> An autofs or nfs automounted mount. Can those ever become root?

Dunno.

I thought that this code was what set MNT_LOCKED for things that
should be locked:

/* Don't allow unprivileged users to reveal what is under a mount */
if ((flag & CL_UNPRIVILEGED) && list_empty(&old->mnt_expire))
mnt->mnt.mnt_flags |= MNT_LOCKED;

Now I'm confused. Shouldn't that be checking for submounts? Is that
what it's doing?

Anyway, I think that this should unconditionally set MNT_LOCKED on the
thing that mounted on rootfs.

--Andy


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-08 02:21    [W:0.071 / U:0.956 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site