Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:23:15 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ASoC: add xtensa xtfpga I2S interface and platform | From | Max Filippov <> |
| |
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 08:00:45PM +0300, Max Filippov wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> > I would also expect to see the data transfer and I2S bits more split >> >> > out, presumably this IP can actually be used in designs with a DMA >> >> > controller and one would expect that for practical systems this would be >> >> > the common case? > >> >> I don't know of other designs that use this IP block. Can we do it when >> >> we get such users? > >> > It's also about ensuring that the code is cleanly split up so that >> > someone can actually go in and add the required support later (and TBH > >> Can you point me to an example of such split, so that I don't write it in >> an unusual way? > > Essentially all drivers are split this way...
But all of them have DMA registers and I2S registers completely separated, right? How do I share registers between pcm and i2s parts?
-- Thanks. -- Max
| |