lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: blk-mq vs cpu hotplug performance (due to percpu_ref_put performance)
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 09:20:55PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> I have not verified this, but I guess what happens is:
> hotplug
> -> notify
> -> blk_mq_queue_reinit_notify
> -> blk_mq_queue_reinit
> -> blk_mq_freeze_queue
> -> percpu_ref_kill
> -> percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm
> -> __percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic
> -> call_rcu_sched

But call_rcu_sched() wouldn't show up as latency. It's an async call
unlike synchronize_*().

Thanks.

--
tejun


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-28 21:41    [W:0.046 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site