lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] sched: CPU topology try
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 10:30:33AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> The design looks good to me. In my opinion information like P-states and
> C-states dependency can be kept separate from the topology levels, it
> might get too complicated unless the information is tightly coupled to
> the topology.

I'm not entirely convinced we can keep them separated, the moment we
have multiple CPUs sharing a P or C state we need somewhere to manage
the shared state and the domain tree seems like the most natural place
for this.

Now it might well be both P and C states operate at 'natural' domains
which we already have so it might be 'easy'.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-06 18:41    [W:0.177 / U:0.720 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site