Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:24:11 -0600 | From | Rob Landley <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Documentation cleanup, update 00-INDEX files in Documentation/ |
| |
On 01/29/14 18:27, Henrik Austad wrote: > Some of the 00-INDEX files are somewhat outdated and some folders does not > contain 00-INDEX at all. Only outdated (with the notably exception of > spi) indexes are touched here, the 169 folders without 00-INDEX has not > been touched. > > This applies to Linus' tip (0e47c969).
Looks like an improvement.
Acked-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
(My own scripts to find this stuff are based on maintaining http://kernel.org/doc and the kernel developers are no longer capable of providing rsync access to that, despite repeated requests. Most recently https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52721 )
However, I'm curious about this bit:
> --- a/Documentation/00-INDEX > +++ b/Documentation/00-INDEX > @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ > > -This is a brief list of all the files in ./linux/Documentation and what > -they contain. If you add a documentation file, please list it here in > -alphabetical order as well, or risk being hunted down like a rabid dog. > -Please keep the descriptions small enough to fit on one line. > - Thanks -- Paul G. > +# This is a brief list of all the files in ./linux/Documentation and what > +# they contain. If you add a documentation file, please list it here in > +# alphabetical order as well, or risk being hunted down like a rabid dog. > +# Please keep the descriptions small enough to fit on one line. > +# Thanks -- Paul G. > > -Following translations are available on the WWW: > +# Following translations are available on the WWW:
Is there a reason for that?
Rob
| |