Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:34:17 +0200 | From | Amir Vadai <> | Subject | Re: net/mlx4_core: clean up two functions |
| |
On 13/01/14 11:13 -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> > Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:00:22 +0100 > > > 0) These two patches are very similar. They both clean up a function to > > help GCC understand the codeflow. Both help silence a warning. > > > > 1) Compile tested only (on 32 bits x86). I do not have this hardware. > > > > 2) Please note that there's no MAINTAINERS entry for mlx4_core. (Neither > > is there an entry for the MLX4 IB driver.) Shouldn't it be added? > > These patches have been rotting for a week. I know the mlx4 folks > said the SRIOV guy inside Mellanox will look at it, but this is taking > way too long. > > This is absolutely unreasonable from Paul's perspective to have to wait > this long for a review of these relatively simple patches.
You're absolutely right. And yes, jack is very busy. We will have a reply ready tomorrow morning.
Amir
> -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |