lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
Date
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 13:18 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

> You may as well bite the bullet on this one, and tie it together. Without
> Secure Boot, by the time your code runs it's already too late. That's the
> whole point of Secure Boot, after all.

It's already been made clear that nobody's interested in merging a
solution that's specific to Secure Boot. I can add a command line option
to set a default, and then anyone using an attesting bootloader
(TPM/TXT) can verify the state.

--
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-09 19:41    [W:0.240 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site