Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 7/7] x86: Tell about irq stack coverage | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Wed, 25 Sep 2013 17:40:27 -0700 |
| |
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:08:20 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > > > +# define __ARCH_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK > > > +#endif > > > > Ok, see the previous email, this should just be a single > > > > select IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK > > > > in under the "config X86_64" header in arch/x86/Kconfig. > > > > And as of right now, this patch series should do it for Power too, > > since I just merged Ben's branch, which contained commit 0366a1c70b89 > > ("powerpc/irq: Run softirqs off the top of the irq stack"). Again, > > just a single select in the arch/powerpc/Kconfig gile should be > > sufficient. > > > > This happens quite a lot. Perhaps Joe can cook us up a checkpatch > rule. "#define [__]ARCH_HA" looks like a decent search pattern. >
Huh? That matches all the ARCH_HAS_<foo> patterns.
What is it you want again?
| |