Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Sep 2013 01:47:34 +0200 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [Results] [RFC PATCH v4 00/40] mm: Memory Power Management |
| |
> Also, the changelogs don't appear to discuss one obvious downside: the > latency incurred in bringing a bank out of one of the low-power states > and back into full operation. Please do discuss and quantify that to > the best of your knowledge.
On Sandy Bridge the memry wakeup overhead is really small. It's on by default in most setups today.
-Andi
-- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
| |