lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf: Support for Openembedded/Yocto -dbg packages
Hello Ingo Arnaldo and Peter

I have just posted v3,

Thanks for your comments!

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> wrote:
>
>> Em Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:18:01PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
>> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:02:12PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>> > > Perhaps this is even more clear than v2:
>>
>> > > len = snprintf(file, size, "%s", symbol_conf.symfs);
>> > > size -= len;
>> > > file += len;
>> > > len = snprintf(file, MIN(size,(last_slash - dso->long_name) + 2),
>> > > "%s", dso->long_name);
>> > > size -= len;
>> > > file += len;
>> > > len = snprintf(file, size, ".debug%s", last_slash);
>>
>> > len = 0;
>>
>> > len += snprintf(str + len, size - len, ...);
>> > len += snprintf(str + len, size - len, ...);
>>
>> And avoid snprintf like the plague, use scnprintf instead... See
>> e7f01d1e3d8d501deb8abeaa269d5d48a703b8b0 for details :-)
>
> Hm, could we do:
>
> #define snprintf scnprintf
>
> or:
>
> #define snprintf(x...) BUILD_BUG()
>
> ?
>
> I don't think there's any valid code, except printf wrappers (which we
> don't have in perf), where the semantics of snprintf() would be needed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo



--
Ricardo Ribalda


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-18 16:01    [W:0.073 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site