lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: STi: Supply I2C configuration to STiH415 SoC
On 09/18/2013 02:00 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013, Maxime COQUELIN wrote:
>
>> This patch supplies I2C configuration to STiH415 SoC.
>>
>> Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi
>> index 1d322b2..e56449d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi
>> @@ -86,6 +86,24 @@
>> };
>> };
>> };
>> +
>> + sbc_i2c0 {
>> + pinctrl_sbc_i2c0_default: sbc_i2c0-default {
>> + st,pins {
>> + sda = <&PIO4 6 ALT1 BIDIR>;
>> + scl = <&PIO4 5 ALT1 BIDIR>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + sbc_i2c1 {
>> + pinctrl_sbc_i2c1_default: sbc_i2c1-default {
>> + st,pins {
>> + sda = <&PIO3 2 ALT2 BIDIR>;
>> + scl = <&PIO3 1 ALT2 BIDIR>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> pin-controller-front {
>> @@ -143,6 +161,24 @@
>> reg = <0x7000 0x100>;
>> st,bank-name = "PIO12";
>> };
>> +
>> + i2c0 {
>> + pinctrl_i2c0_default: i2c0-default {
>> + st,pins {
>> + sda = <&PIO9 3 ALT1 BIDIR>;
>> + scl = <&PIO9 2 ALT1 BIDIR>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + i2c1 {
>> + pinctrl_i2c1_default: i2c1-default {
>> + st,pins {
>> + sda = <&PIO12 1 ALT1 BIDIR>;
>> + scl = <&PIO12 0 ALT1 BIDIR>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>>
>> pin-controller-rear {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi
>> index 74ab8de..643ae1c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>> #include "stih41x.dtsi"
>> #include "stih415-clock.dtsi"
>> #include "stih415-pinctrl.dtsi"
>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> / {
>>
>> L2: cache-controller {
>> @@ -83,5 +84,61 @@
>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_sbc_serial1>;
>> };
>> +
>> + i2c0: i2c@fed40000{
> Space before the '{'.
It will be fixed in next series
>
>> + compatible = "st,comms-i2c";
>> + status = "disabled";
> Consider putting the node status at the bottom.
Ok.
>
>> + reg = <0xfed40000 0x110>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 187 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> + clocks = <&CLKS_ICN_REG_0>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c0_default>;
>> + st,glitches;
>> + st,glitch-clk = <500>;
>> + st,glitch-dat = <500>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + i2c1: i2c@fed41000{
> Same here and throughout.
Ok.
>
>> + compatible = "st,comms-i2c";
>> + status = "disabled";
> Same here and throughout.
Ok.
>
>> + reg = <0xfed41000 0x110>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 188 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> + clocks = <&CLKS_ICN_REG_0>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c1_default>;
>> + st,glitches;
>> + st,glitch-clk = <500>;
>> + st,glitch-dat = <500>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sbc_i2c0: i2c@fe540000{
>> + compatible = "st,comms-i2c";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + reg = <0xfe540000 0x110>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 206 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> + clocks = <&CLK_SYSIN>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_sbc_i2c0_default>;
>> + st,glitches;
>> + st,glitch-clk = <500>;
>> + st,glitch-dat = <500>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sbc_i2c1: i2c@fe541000{
>> + compatible = "st,comms-i2c";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + reg = <0xfe541000 0x110>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 207 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> + clocks = <&CLK_SYSIN>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_sbc_i2c1_default>;
>> + st,glitches;
>> + st,glitch-clk = <500>;
>> + st,glitch-dat = <500>;
>> + };
>> };
>> };
> Is this odd tabbing just the result of the patch format?
This is just the result of the patch format.

Regards,
Maxime



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-18 15:01    [W:0.645 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site