lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: linux-next stats (Was: Linux 3.12-rc1)
    From
    Date
    Hi Stephen,

    On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 15:50 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
    > On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:08:11 -0400 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
    > >
    > > So it's been two weeks, and the merge window for 3.12 is now closed.
    >
    > As usual, the executive friendly graph is at
    > http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html :-)
    >
    > (No merge commits counted, next-20130903 was the linux-next based on v3.11)
    >
    > Commits in v3.12-rc1 (relative to v3.11): 9474 (v3.11-rc11: 9494)
    > Commits in next-20130903: 8891 (next-20130701: 8929)
    > Commits with the same SHA1: 7991 ( 7670)
    > Commits with the same patch_id: 472 (1) ( 759)
    > Commits with the same subject line: 70 (1) ( 55)
    >
    > (1) not counting those in the lines above.
    >
    > So commits in -rc1 that were "in" next-20130903: 8533 90.1% (8484 89.4%)
    > Commits in -rc1 that were not in next-20120722: 941 9.9% (1010 10.6%
    >
    > So better than last time, but it would be still nice to figure out where
    > the last lot came from. I have the "git log --oneline --no-walk" list if
    > someone wants them.
    >
    > Some breakdown of that list:
    >
    > Top ten first word of commit summary:
    >
    > 57 net
    > 53 mips
    > 49 drm
    > 47 [scsi]
    > 23 perf
    > 23 nfs
    > 20 cifs
    > 19 nvme
    > 18 vfs
    > 17 arm
    >
    > Top ten authors:
    >
    > 33 Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
    > 21 Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
    > 20 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
    > 18 James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
    > 17 Jon Mason <jon.mason@intel.com>
    > 17 Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
    > 16 Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
    > 16 Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
    > 15 Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
    > 14 Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
    >

    I'm totally confused by these stats..

    The target-pending/for-next pull had ~30 commits with the term 'target'
    in the first word of the commit summary, and yours truly had 40 commits
    merged.

    Is there a reason why these would not be showing up in the above..?

    --nab



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-09-18 02:41    [W:5.150 / U:0.396 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site