lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] perf fixes
On 9/12/13 2:18 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> kconf approach of course:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/1/600
>> (minus the manual steps in that RFC).
>
> I'm not sure what the end stage is where you'd like to arrive, but I don't
> think that forcing a separate configuration pass is an improvement :-/

once I have a working config -- say one for a target (minimal build) and
one for analysis (more but not all features -- eg., no gtk) I never see
auto-probing again. At best some new feature (config) comes along and
the config has to be updated again, but kconf only inquires about new
features.

>
> By default a simple 'make' should build perf to the maximum extent
> possible, with no other input required from the user - with warnings
> displayed as package install suggestions.

By default there is no config. Autoprobing generates a first one or a
user can specify a defconfig.

David


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-13 00:21    [W:0.638 / U:1.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site