This message generated a parse failure. Raw output follows here. Please use 'back' to navigate. From devnull@lkml.org Wed Apr 24 01:01:01 2024 Envelope-to: j@jasper.es Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:35:34 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=squeeze.vs19.net) by squeeze.vs19.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VJgpi-0001Jv-7N for j@jasper.es; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:35:34 +0200 Original-Recipient: rfc822;jasper@telfort.nl Received: from pop3.telfort.nl [213.75.3.52] by squeeze.vs19.net with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.21) for (single-drop); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:35:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cpxmta-msg06.kpnxchange.com (10.94.114.27) by cpxmbs-msg01.support.local (8.6.060.30) id 522FAFB80003E075 for jasper@telfort.nl; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:32:28 +0200 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews09.kpnxchange.com (213.75.39.14) by cpxmta-msg06.kpnxchange.com (8.6.060.14) id 522FB663000B704E for jasper@telfort.nl; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:32:28 +0200 Received: from cpsps-ews22.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.188]) by cpsmtpb-ews09.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:32:28 +0200 Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by cpsps-ews22.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:32:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753390Ab3IKJcV convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 05:32:21 -0400 Received: from smtp.nue.novell.com ([195.135.221.5]:53762 "EHLO smtp.nue.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753105Ab3IKJcT (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 05:32:19 -0400 Received: from [147.2.211.81] (syd-fw-asa1.apac.novell.com [130.57.30.250]) by smtp.nue.novell.com with ESMTP (TLS encrypted); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:32:10 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown From: joeyli To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , David Lang , "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "keescook@chromium.org" , "gregkh@linuxfo In-Reply-To: <1378837571.17615.0.camel@x230.lan> References: <1378741786-18430-1-git-send-email-matthew.garrett@nebula.com> <19562.1378747124@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1378767723.17982.27.camel@x230.lan> <1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:32:52 +0800 Message-Id: <1378891972.6193.137.camel@linux-s257.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-Id: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Sep 2013 09:32:28.0412 (UTC) FILETIME=[D4EE7BC0:01CEAED1] X-RcptDomain: telfort.nl =E6=96=BC =E4=BA=8C=EF=BC=8C2013-09-10 =E6=96=BC 18:26 +0000=EF=BC=8CMa= tthew Garrett =E6=8F=90=E5=88=B0=EF=BC=9A > On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 14:23 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > That's why modern systems require signed firmware updates. > >=20 > > Linux doesn't. Is someone working on adding signature support to t= he > > runtime firmware loader? >=20 > It'd be simple to do so, but so far the model appears to be that devi= ces > that expect signed firmware enforce that themselves. >=20 > --=20 > Matthew Garrett > NrybX=C7=A7v^)=DE=BA{.n+{y^nrz=1Ah&=1EGh=03(=E9=9A=8E=DD=A2j"=1A=1Bmz= =DE=96fh~m Takashi has a implementation of firmware check: [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] Add firmware signature file check https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/8/343 Thanks Joey Lee -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"= in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/