Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 1 Sep 2013 14:11:39 -0400 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] spinlock: A new lockref structure for lockless update of refcount |
| |
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 08:49:48 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Nobody used to care, because we used to not use that broken type in the kernel.
I've been told that gcc works better with 'bool' than with an int. Should I replace those bools with bit fields in the structure?
-- Steve
| |