Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:13:52 +0100 | From | Richard Fitzgerald <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ASoC: core: init delayed_work for codec-codec links |
| |
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:25:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:16:44PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > > > Pointing it to a dummy work callback is cleaner than taking > > special cases in the code to bypass the flush_delayed_work_sync(). > > Why is this better than pointing at the normal work that you'd expect to > be used there?
By 'normal work' do you mean the close_delayed_work() used for standard PCM DAIs?
| |